6 Best AI Agent Builders for Agencies (2026)
This page may contain affiliate links. If you buy through them we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Quick pick: if your business model is reselling AI chat agents to multiple clients under your own brand, Stammer is the platform actually built for that, branded domains, client subaccounts, and a dashboard that keeps the underlying vendor invisible to your clients. If you're building fewer, more custom agents for higher-touch clients instead of reselling a templated product, Voiceflow or Botpress fit that model better. We compared six platforms specifically on what matters to an agency: can you brand it as your own, can you isolate client data, and does the pricing leave room for margin.
Comparison table
| Tool | Reseller model | White-label branding | Client isolation | Starting price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stammer | Built for reselling | Yes, logos and custom domains | Subaccounts per client | Starting around $49/month, Agency tier around $197/month |
| Voiceflow | Project-based custom builds | Limited | Workspace-based | Check current pricing; seat-based |
| Botpress | Project-based, self-hosted option | Partial, via self-hosted core | Workspace-based | Free tier, then usage-based |
| Relevance AI | Multi-agent systems per client | Limited | Workspace-based | Usage-based (actions + model cost) |
| Chatbase | Light reselling for simple widgets | Add-on, priced separately | Workspace-based | Entry tier for one agent, then usage-based |
| Lindy | Internal ops or project delivery | None | N/A | Free tier, then usage-based |
1. Stammer: best for pure white-label reselling
Stammer is built around the agency reseller model specifically, not retrofitted onto a general chatbot product. Its Agency tier adds a white-label dashboard, your own logo and domain, and client subaccounts, so a client logging in sees your brand, not Stammer's, and you set your own markup on top of whatever the platform charges you underneath. The entry Starter plan covers a single agent for agencies still learning the category, with the Agency tier scaling to cover a real client roster.
When NOT to use it: if you want deep, custom agent logic for a single high-value client rather than a repeatable product across many smaller ones, Stammer's templated reseller model is built for volume, not bespoke engineering; a platform like Voiceflow or Botpress gives you more room to build something genuinely differentiated.
2. Voiceflow: best for custom, higher-touch client builds
Voiceflow's visual canvas is built for designing a conversation flow collaboratively before layering in AI reasoning, which suits agencies pitching a differentiated, brand-specific agent rather than a reselled template. Its voice-agent tooling is notably more mature than most of the field, a real advantage if a client wants an IVR-style phone agent alongside chat. You're building and billing per client project here, not running a reseller dashboard; clients typically see the finished agent embedded on their own site, not a Voiceflow-branded portal.
When NOT to use it: skip it if your model is volume reselling of a mostly-templated agent to many small clients; Voiceflow's per-seat, design-heavy workflow doesn't scale the same way a purpose-built reseller platform does.
3. Botpress: best for dev-heavy agencies wanting cost control
Botpress pairs a visual flow builder with LLM reasoning, and its open-source core means a technically capable agency can self-host and brand the underlying infrastructure itself, the closest thing to true white-labeling on this list outside a purpose-built reseller platform. That control comes at the cost of real engineering time; self-hosting, branding, and maintaining a multi-tenant setup yourself is a meaningfully bigger lift than paying for Stammer's dashboard.
When NOT to use it: if nobody on your team wants to own infrastructure, the managed cloud version still works for client delivery but doesn't give you the white-label depth that makes self-hosting worth the extra setup. Our Botpress vs Voiceflow comparison covers that specific matchup if you're choosing between the two.
4. Relevance AI: best for multi-agent client systems
Relevance AI is built around teams of agents working together rather than a single chat widget, which fits an agency client whose actual need is a multi-step process, research, drafting, review, handoff, not a simple FAQ bot. Pricing runs on a dual-meter model: a flat charge each time a tool or agent runs, plus the underlying model cost passed through separately, which makes per-client cost estimation less predictable than a flat reseller fee until you've run a client's actual workload through it.
When NOT to use it: if a client just needs a single support or lead-qualification chat agent, Relevance AI's multi-agent complexity is overkill; a simpler, single-agent tool will get the same job done with far less setup and more predictable billing.
5. Chatbase: best for fast, low-cost single-widget clients
Chatbase gets a simple, document-trained chat widget live for a client faster than almost anything else on this list, which makes it a reasonable choice for an agency's smallest or most budget-conscious clients who just need a working FAQ bot on their site. White-labeling (removing Chatbase's own branding) is a separate paid add-on rather than bundled into a reseller tier, and Chatbase's own published terms put client pricing, billing, and support on the agency, not the platform, so you're handling client-facing operations yourself either way.
When NOT to use it: skip it for any client whose need goes beyond a document-trained FAQ widget; Chatbase isn't built for the multi-agent or highly custom workflows Relevance AI or Voiceflow handle.
6. Lindy: best for an agency's own internal ops, not resale
Lindy earns a spot here for a different reason than the rest of the list: it's genuinely strong for an agency's own internal AI employee, triaging the agency's inbox, qualifying inbound leads, drafting client-update emails, work you do for yourself rather than resell to a client. It has no white-label or reseller program, so using it to deliver an ongoing branded product to clients doesn't fit its design; you'd be handing a client a Lindy-branded interface, not your own.
When NOT to use it: don't use Lindy as your client-facing reseller product; use it to run your own agency more efficiently while a purpose-built platform like Stammer handles what you actually sell to clients. Our Lindy review covers where it holds up for that internal-ops use case in more depth.
How to choose
- Choose Stammer if your business model is reselling branded AI agents to many clients and you want the reseller tooling (subaccounts, white-label domain, your own markup) built in from the start.
- Choose Voiceflow or Botpress if you're building fewer, more custom agents for higher-value clients who want something genuinely differentiated, not a templated resale.
- Choose Relevance AI when a client's actual need is a coordinated multi-agent process, not a single chat widget.
- Choose Chatbase for your smallest, most budget-conscious clients who just need a working FAQ bot fast.
- Choose Lindy to run your own agency's internal operations, not as the product you hand to clients.
Whichever platform you pick, check client-data isolation before you sign your first real client, not after. A white-label logo on the login page is cosmetic; what actually protects you is each client's documents, conversation history, and API keys living in a genuinely separate subaccount rather than a shared workspace with access controls layered on top. If you're weighing a workflow-automation platform instead of a pure agent builder for client delivery, our best no-code AI agent builders roundup covers that broader category, and our best general-purpose AI employees guide is the better starting point if what you're actually selling is "an AI employee" framing rather than a branded chat widget.
Frequently asked questions
What's the real difference between a white-label AI agent platform and just using Lindy or Botpress for clients?
A true white-label platform gives you branded domains, client subaccounts with isolated data, and often a client-facing billing or usage dashboard under your own name, built so clients never see the underlying vendor. Lindy and most agent builders let you build agents FOR clients and hand off the result, but the platform itself stays visibly the vendor's product, which is fine for project-based work and a problem if you're trying to sell ongoing platform access as your own.
How much does it cost to start reselling AI agents as an agency?
Entry tiers built for this specifically start in the roughly $150 to $200 a month range for a platform like Stammer's Agency plan, which covers a meaningful number of client agents and white-label branding. General-purpose builders like Voiceflow or Botpress price per seat or per resolution instead, so your cost scales more directly with client volume rather than a flat reseller fee.
Can I white-label Lindy or Botpress?
Not in the fullest sense. Botpress has an open-source core you can self-host and brand yourself if you're comfortable with that engineering lift, which is the closest thing to white-labeling it offers. Lindy has no white-label or reseller program; you build agents using Lindy's own branded interface, then deliver the finished agent or its output to a client, which works for project-based billing but not for reselling ongoing platform access under your own name.
Which platform is cheapest for an agency with just one or two clients?
Chatbase or a Stammer Starter-tier plan, both priced for a single agent before you need the full reseller tier. Don't commit to an Agency-level plan with per-client markup economics until you have enough signed clients to make the higher fixed monthly cost worth it; most of these platforms let you upgrade once volume justifies it.